The history of liquidity: From Wall Street to crypto

Luidity is one of the most vital concepts in finance. It’s the oil that greases the gears of markets, allowing assets to be bought and sold smoothly and efficiently. Without it, markets seize up, prices become volatile, and value becomes difficult to access.

For centuries, liquidity was the exclusive domain of centralized institutions like banks and stock exchanges. The rise of decentralized finance (DeFi) challenged this model, sparking a wave of innovation that completely redefined how liquidity is created, managed, and accessed.

This journey is far from over. The next great challenge is to bring the revolutionary liquidity solutions of DeFi to the largest asset class in the world: real-world assets (RWAs). This article will explore the fascinating history of liquidity, from its traditional roots to its DeFi transformation, and look ahead to how platforms like Rayls are building the infrastructure for the next financial frontier.

‍

What is liquidity? A traditional perspective

Before diving into the complexities of DeFi, let’s start with the basics. In the simplest terms, liquidity refers to the ease with which an asset can be converted into cash without significantly affecting its market price.

Think about it in terms of things you might own:

• A Liquid Asset: The cash in your wallet is the most liquid asset possible. You can exchange it for goods and services at its face value instantly. Stocks of a large company like Apple or Google are also highly liquid. During market hours, you can sell your shares for cash in seconds, and your individual sale is unlikely to move the stock’s price.
• An Illiquid Asset: Now, consider a house or a rare piece of art. These are illiquid assets. Selling a house can take months and involves significant fees for agents, lawyers, and inspections. The final price might be very different from your initial asking price. You cannot instantly convert your house into cash at a stable price.

In traditional finance (TradFi), liquidity is provided by market makers. These are typically large financial institutions or trading firms that stand ready to both buy and sell a particular asset. They maintain an order book, which is a list of buy orders (bids) and sell orders (asks) from various participants at different price levels.

The market maker profits from the bid-ask spread, which is the small difference between the highest price a buyer is willing to pay (bid) and the lowest price a seller is willing to accept (ask). By always offering a price, they ensure that anyone wanting to trade can do so immediately, creating a liquid and stable market.

This system has been in use for decades, but it has its limitations. It is centralized, permissioned, and opaque. It relies on powerful intermediaries, creating high barriers to entry and excluding many from participating in global markets. This is particularly true for historically illiquid assets like private credit or commercial real estate, which remain inaccessible to the average person.

‍

The dawn of DeFi: A new liquidity problem

The advent of Bitcoin and later Ethereum brought the promise of a new financial system: one that was open, permissionless, and transparent. Early decentralized exchanges (DEXs) were a natural first step. Their goal was to replicate the function of a traditional exchange, like the NYSE or Nasdaq, but entirely on the blockchain.

These first-generation DEXs tried to directly copy the TradFi model by implementing on-chain order books. Users could submit buy and sell orders, which were recorded directly on the blockchain.

However, this model ran into major problems due to the inherent nature of blockchains like Ethereum:

1. High Cost: Every action on Ethereum, from placing an order to canceling it, requires a gas fee. For professional market makers who update their orders thousands of times a day, this was prohibitively expensive.
2. Slow Speed: Blockchains are relatively slow. Confirming a transaction can take several seconds to a minute, which is an eternity in the world of high-frequency trading. This latency made it impossible for market makers to react to price changes quickly, exposing them to significant risk.
3. Fragmented Liquidity: Because liquidity was so difficult and expensive to provide, it was spread thinly across many different assets and platforms, resulting in poor pricing (high slippage) for traders.

The on-chain order book model was a noble experiment, but it was clear that for DeFi to succeed, it needed a completely new, blockchain-native solution to the liquidity problem.

‍

The AMM breakthrough: Uniswap and the magic of pools

The major innovation that unlocked DeFi’s potential was the Automated Market Maker (AMM). Pioneered by projects like Bancor and popularized by Uniswap, the AMM did away with the traditional order book entirely.

Instead of matching individual buyers and sellers, an AMM relies on liquidity pools.

A liquidity pool is essentially a big pot of digital assets locked in a smart contract. For example, a pool might contain two tokens, such as Ether (ETH) and a stablecoin like USDC. These funds are supplied by users, who are known as Liquidity Providers (LPs).

‍

In return for depositing their assets into the pool, LPs receive LP tokens, which represent their share of that pool. When other users trade against the pool (e.g., swapping ETH for USDC), they pay a small fee, which is then distributed pro-rata to all the LPs in the pool. This fee serves as the incentive for users to provide liquidity.

But how does the AMM determine the price of an asset without an order book?

It uses a simple but brilliant mathematical formula. The most common one, used by Uniswap V2, is the constant product formula:

x⋅y=k

Where:

• x is the amount of Token A in the pool.
• y is the amount of Token B in the pool.
• k is a constant.

The formula means that the product of the quantities of the two tokens in the pool must always remain the same. When a trader wants to buy ETH from the ETH/USDC pool, they add USDC to the pool and remove ETH. To keep k constant, the price of ETH automatically increases as its supply in the pool decreases. This elegant, automated mechanism allows for constant, 24/7 liquidity without any active market maker.

This AMM model was revolutionary. It was permissionless, meaning anyone could create a market for any token, and anyone could become a liquidity provider to earn fees. It democratized market making and solved the core problems of on-chain order books, igniting the "DeFi Summer" of 2020 and unleashing a torrent of innovation.

A note on impermanent loss

Providing liquidity is not without its risks. The most significant one is impermanent loss. This is a potential loss in value that LPs can experience when the price of the tokens in the pool changes compared to simply holding the tokens in their wallet.

It occurs because the AMM constantly rebalances the pool. If one asset skyrockets in value, the pool sells that asset to maintain its balance, meaning the LP ends up holding less of the appreciating asset and more of the depreciating one. The "loss" is considered impermanent because if the prices of the tokens return to their original ratio, the loss disappears. However, if the LP withdraws their funds when there is a large price divergence, the loss becomes permanent. Trading fees can often offset this loss, but it is a critical concept for LPs to understand.

‍

The evolution of liquidity: The quest for capital efficiency

The classic AMM model was a massive leap forward, but it wasn't perfect. Its primary drawback was capital inefficiency.

In a Uniswap V2-style pool, liquidity is distributed evenly along an infinite price curve, from zero to infinity. This means that a huge portion of the capital in the pool sits idle, waiting for extreme price movements that may never happen. For a stablecoin pair like USDC/DAI, which should always trade around $1.00, the liquidity reserved for a price of $0.50 or $2.00 is effectively wasted.

This inefficiency led to the next wave of AMM innovation.

‍

Concentrated liquidity: Uniswap V3

In 2021, Uniswap V3 introduced the concept of concentrated liquidity. Instead of providing liquidity across all possible prices, LPs could now choose a specific price range in which to concentrate their capital.

For example, an LP in an ETH/USDC pool could choose to provide liquidity only within the $2,000 to $3,000 price range for ETH. By doing so, they put their capital to work in the most active trading zone. This allows LPs to earn the same amount of fees as older models but with a fraction of the capital.

This was a profound improvement. It made liquidity provision far more efficient and flexible, giving LPs more control and boosting their potential returns. It was like going from using a floodlight to illuminate an entire field to using a focused spotlight on the exact area where the action is happening.

‍

Specialized AMMs: Curve and Balancer

Other platforms developed specialized models to solve specific problems:

• Curve Finance: Curve focused on creating extremely efficient markets for assets that are meant to trade at similar prices, like different stablecoins (USDC, USDT, DAI) or different wrapped versions of Bitcoin (wBTC, renBTC). Its specialized formula allows for very low slippage and minimal impermanent loss for these pegged assets, making it a cornerstone of DeFi's stablecoin ecosystem.
• Balancer: Balancer introduced flexible, multi-asset pools. Instead of the standard 50/50 split, a Balancer pool could hold up to eight different tokens in any custom ratio, such as 40% ETH, 40% wBTC, and 20% LINK. This turned liquidity pools into automated index funds that constantly rebalance themselves, offering new strategies for LPs and traders.

‍

The next frontier: Liquidity for real world assets

The DeFi ecosystem has built a truly remarkable financial machine. Through AMMs, concentrated liquidity, and specialized pools, it has created deep, efficient, and accessible liquidity for a universe of digital-native assets.

Now, this powerful machine is being pointed at its biggest target yet: Real World Assets (RWAs).

RWAs are assets that exist in the physical world but are represented as a token on the blockchain. This can include:

• Real Estate: A token representing fractional ownership of a commercial building.
• Private Credit: A token representing a share in a loan made to a private company
• Art & Collectibles: A token representing a piece of a famous painting
• Carbom Credits: A token representing a verified reduction in CO2 emissions.

The RWA market is estimated to be worth hundreds of trillions of dollars. However, as we discussed earlier, these assets are profoundly illiquid. Selling a fraction of a commercial building or a private loan is nearly impossible in the traditional financial system.

This is where the innovations of DeFi become so powerful. By tokenizing these assets, we can make them divisible, transferable, and programmable. And by plugging them into the liquidity infrastructure developed by DeFi, we can solve their age-old illiquidity problem.

This is the mission of platforms like Rayls.

Rayls is building the bridge between the world's largest financial asset class and the world's most advanced liquidity engine, decentralized finance. This will only succeed with infrastructure tailored to the needs of legacy users, while bringing the benefits of crypto.

Rayls aims to create liquid, transparent, and globally accessible markets for an asset that has historically been available only to the wealthy and well-connected.

Imagine a future where you can instantly buy or sell a small fraction of a skyscraper in Tokyo, a vineyard in France, or a rental property in your own city. You could use your tokenized real estate as collateral to take out a loan or provide it to a liquidity pool to earn rental income and trading fees.

It’s the next logical step in the evolution of finance. The tools have been built and tested in the digital realm. The infrastructure for concentrated liquidity and automated market making is mature. Now, platforms like Rayls are applying this technology to unlock the immense value currently trapped in illiquid real-world assets, creating a more open and equitable financial future for everyone.

The journey of liquidity is just beginning.

‍